How I Spent My Summer Vacation

            This year’s summer vacation took a decidedly different path. It was summer of discovery – particularly in the world of technology and learning. Instead of walking the beach, I surfed the web in search of YouTube videos. Instead of reading my favorite novel I have pored over Friedman (2007) and Shirky (2008). If you are reading this, you have obviously found your way to my blog – another new summer pastime. This blog represents some of the abundant fruit that has come from my participation in the Technology and Leadership class at Creighton University. This class is an elective in Creighton’s doctoral program in Interdisciplinary Leadership. After having participated in the course for the past two months, I strongly recommend that it be part of the requirements for this entire program of studies. The issues involved in the overwhelming pace of technological advancement and its effects on people, systems, organizations, and countries should be thoroughly studied and, as best as possible, understood by all who would aspire to lead.

 The Role of Leadership

            I believe that one of the most memorable lessons from this course came early on as we learned of the impact of social media on humbling and bypassing the authoritative regulatory structures of the communication system in the Chinese government as that country was hit by an enormous earthquake. Amateur videos like this one took Twitter, Facebook and YouTube by storm making it impossible for the historically secretive Chinese government to cloak its temporary vulnerability in ways that it had done so often in the past. It is obvious that a new day was upon all those who hope to lead in a society immersed in the tools of the technological age. Global societies are evolving as a result of unprecedented interconnectivity and the massive increases in abilities to gather, store, and utilize data. 

          As we move toward a new age of the “Internet of Things” where the devices that we all own are interconnected, it is incumbent upon leaders to stay abreast of the changes in spite of the bewildering pace that threatens to overwhelm us.

Leadership In Education

            Those of us who are in the field of education are faced with not only deciding how they themselves will utilize technological developments but must remain current in the ways that technology can be implemented by both teachers and students to facilitate the teaching and learning process. There are explosive developments that demand our attention if for no other reason than there is so much money involved. Even more important than the investment required is that the future abilities of our students to successfully compete in a global economy seems to be at stake. At one time it may have been true that in previous generations what was going on across the schools of the world did not matter. However, in today’s hyper-connected world and global economy, our competitors are no longer in neighboring cities and towns but now reside throughout the world. The competitive advantage will go to that society than develops and maintains the most effective system for educating its youth.

Changes as A Result of the This Course

            Today’s learner operates in a technologically rich context. Teachers and schools that are more sensitive to students who are digital natives will maximize the abundance of tools available to today’s classroom. Our thinking as educators needs to evolve as we consider the most effective way students learn.

            In an attempt to better understand this technologically rich context I began by seeking out this class. After talking to other students in the ILD program I was convinced that it would provide me with a much-needed format to review and discuss these developments. I have not been disappointed. Through our review of these tools I have become an active user of Google Docs, Linked In, Twitter, and Feedly. Now that I have a better understanding of the power and value of short visual messages that can be shared, retweeted, and distributed inexpensively I have also immersed myself in a project to develop a series of YouTube videos that will serve as messages to our faculty, parents, students, and alumni. These videos will focus on issues related to our shared mission, stewardship of the students placed in our care, the importance of parental involvement in the education of high school students, the proper role of technology in the learning process, and a host of other activities pertinent to the life of a high school. Vogt (2011) has written and spoken about the power of New Media to spread the Gospel – a task that is deeply connected to the evangelizing mission of a Catholic school. It would be my desire to see our school participating in this method of developing the faith of the young people.


            There is pressure on leaders to adopt and conform to these new technologies. However, as we were constantly challenged in this class to think about ways to accommodate the rapid pace of adjustment that is sometimes demanded, I was constantly brought back to consider how critical it is for leaders to remain focused on the moral implications of their decisions. Leaders need to be people of integrity who can be trusted to make decisions for the general advancement of the common good. To be effective, a person who aspires to lead must develop a track record of wise and reasoned decision-making. It is only in developing such a reputation that a leader can build the trust required to be truly transformative in their community. It is not the tools of technology that develop this trust. It is a real human person making sound decisions for the benefit of others. The tools of communication that technology allows today are simply tools that a leader can use to help build the trust that is at the core of good leadership.

             It has been good to have a chance to learn more about these tools and their most effective use. I am grateful for having the experience of participating in this class.


Friedman, T. L. (2007). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Picador/Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin Press.

Vogt, B. (2011). The church and new media: Blogging converts, online activists, and bishops who tweet. Huntington, IN: Our Sunday Visitor.


Act Justly, Love What Is good, Walk Humbly With Your God

Once again, this week’s material has provided much food for thought for all aspiring leaders. I think this is especially true for those of us among this group of doctoral students who are older. I will be celebrating my 60th birthday this month and I certainly consider myself among that group of old-timers. Needless to say, I am not a digital native. I am constantly reminded of this fact and this week provided me with yet another reminder. As I watched the videos on Google Glass, which I had read about but had assumed were simply a product in the prototype stage in the same way that we have engineers working on driverless cars, it occurred to me that these may actually be on the market. I quickly got on Amazon and found that for $1,500-$1,900 I could buy myself a new pair! My point being that what I assumed was still in the “science fiction” stage had already reached the open market with unprecedented speed.

Shirky’s epilogue (2008) offered a reflection on some advantages of youth in the tech arena and I wholeheartedly agree. However, aspiring leaders cannot forget that the workforce in the organizations that we lead are made up of lots of people such as myself who are reasonably well educated and yet consistently surprised and overwhelmed by the technological capabilities that are suddenly placed at our fingertips. Sensitivity to the steepness of the learning curve for some is called for. We should be less tolerant of those who show no interest in learning or no desire to change their ways. If we are to remain productive at the level that competitive societies demand, these new tools have to be learned and incorporated into our daily means of living productive lives. Just show a bit of patience with those of us born in the 1950s!

My other bit of advice to aspiring leaders is to not be overwhelmed by the flash, bells, and whistles of technologies to the point that we think that our job as leaders is to simply provide these tools for a modernized workforce. I believe that good leaders must always be well grounded in a personal integrity that is blended with a set of interpersonal relational skills that allows for good communication and an ability to convey a vision about the ultimate purpose of the work of an organization. Vision, and the ability to articulate it , remains critical.

There is a passage from Scripture which has always been referred to by many spiritual teachers as a succinct summary of what is asked of all of us.

“You have been told, oh Mortal, what is good, and what the Lord requires of you: “Only to do justice, love what is good, and walk humbly with your God.” (Micah 6:8).

No matter how much change technology brings to the world, nor how fast it comes, great leaders will still 1) act justly 2) love what is good and 3) remain humble. The past two years at Creighton have taught me that this set of principles for living are deeply congruent with Jesuit values that have stood the test of time for the past five centuries – a time of tumultuous technological advance. I am fully confident in placing my trust in these same three principles written 3,000 years ago.


Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin Press.

Gift from God or Tool of the Devil?

          There has been no ambivalence on the position of the past three Popes regarding the value of the Internet to human society. Most recently Pope Francis weighed in by proclaiming that the Internet is a “gift from God” (Kington, 2014). Previously, Pope Benedict had claimed that if the Internet had been around during the time of St. Paul that he would have used every tool available as a result of this technology. Pope Benedict (2013) also taught that the Internet itself is an extraordinarily powerful but morally neutral means of communication that can be used as a tool to achieve unprecedented good. At the same time Benedict recognized that there are great evils that are associated with the ways in which humanity uses the Internet. It is with this dichotomy of possibilities that the discussion regarding the Internet follows a path similar to that of nuclear energy as society recognizes the great potential for good existing simultaneously with the great potential for evil.

            It is instructive that we see this same pattern evolving with the use of technology in the realm of education. For the purposes of this assignment in which we have been asked to blog about the ethical issues related to the use of technology in education I decided to turn to the local team of experts with whom I live (also known as my children) to get their perspectives based on their own experiences of education today. One just graduated from college, two will be returning to college next month, and the fourth will be a junior in high school.

“Scatterbrained Idiots”

It is interesting to me that the most common response I got was exemplified by my daughter who said “It turns kids into scatterbrained idiots.” This is admittedly a pretty harsh judgment. When I probed for details I was given countless anecdotes related to classmates using cell phones, visiting Pinterest sites, Instagram accounts, playing Candy Crush, and actively Facebooking during class. When I asked my children why they felt this was an ethical issue they responded that it all became an enormous distraction. It robbed the students of their best opportunities to learn. Additionally, their fellow classmates were unable to actively participate in class because they were not actually paying attention to the subject matter the instructor was trying to teach. They also felt that there were ethical issues related to the individual schools touting their ability to develop technologically savvy graduates when in reality the technical expertise had little to do with the areas in which students were studying for degrees.


The second most common response that I got was that the technology offered numerous temptations to be dishonest. This dishonesty can take place in many ways. Fellow classmates can take pictures of test questions for students who will be taking the test the next period, week, or semester. Another means by which dishonesty takes place is, of course, plagiarism. I did not have to go to my children to understand this one. However, it was instructive that they each knew it was possible to not only “copy and paste” text from a web source into their own paper but that it was not unheard of for people to purchase papers over the Internet. This practice can be curbed somewhat through the use of websites such as commonly used by English composition teachers. This website compares the text from papers that students submit to a massive database of papers that have been seriously published. However, even is no match for the student who wants to go out and purchase one of the many services available that will provide you with a freshly researched and written original term paper at a cost of $12.00 – $40.00 per page depending upon how fast you need it.


The final issue, which I hear about nearly every week in my role as a school administrator, is cyber-bullying. Bullying has been with us for millennia. However, there is something about the pervasiveness of social media combined with the adolescent tendency to be harshly critical of peers, along with the lack of face-to-face contact when we type messages on computer screens which combines to bring out the worst instincts in teenagers. For some of the worst examples of the results of such bullying you can visit this resource provided by


Just as nuclear fission and fusion are not going anywhere in the near future, the use of technology in education has similarly become rooted in our way of doing things. The wise practitioner in the field of education learns where the pitfalls are, tries to protect the integrity of the teaching–learning process, and instructs their students in the prudent use of the resources provided by technology. It is a tall task but one that must be addressed vigorously.


Kington, T. (2014, January 23). Pope Francis says the Internet is a “gift from God” Retrieved from

Pope Benedict XVI. (2013, May 12). Message for the 47th World Communications Day. Retrieved from

Six Unforgettable Cyberbullying Cases. (n.d.). Retrieved August 1, 2014, from

Today’s Forecast – The Blizzard Will Continue

Once again, this week’s reading provided lots of food for thought and reflection for those of us that are working in the intensely hyper-connected environment of today’s world. One of the most interesting pieces of information that I found while researching this week’s subject for my blog was that Yahoo stock price nearly tripled since CEO Marissa Mayer’s much-derided decision to end telecommuting in February of 2013. Perhaps she was on to something.

In discussing this with my son who is a sophomore in college he asked me an interesting question. Have other companies done anything similar? Upon researching that question I found that the week after the decision by Mayer, electronics retail giant Best Buy followed suit with a similar decision regarding telecommuting workers. Best Buy also saw a similar increase similar percentage increase in its stock price in the months that followed their decision. Would the experiences of these two companies be the death knell for telecommuting? Apparently not.

Further research could not uncover other large companies that had made similar decisions. Given the exceptional results of the stock prices in the 18 months since these decisions were made at Yahoo and Best Buy seems to indicate that Fortune 500 CEOs still embrace policies that allow employees to telecommute. This tells us that there is still a perception that allowing some employees to telecommute is advantageous to companies. What are these advantages? The Pew Internet & American Life Project (2008) on “Networked Workers” does not segment its data in ways that report on telecommuting policies specifically. But the study does tell us that nearly half of all working Americans do at least some work from home. Given that the study was completed in 2008 it seems a safe assumption that that percentage has risen since that time. In effect, this tells us that over half of all working Americans are in one way or another telecommuting at least part of the time.

Some aspects of the Pew study revealed that connected workers are willing to spend more hours meeting the responsibilities of their jobs while at the same time juggling their work and email accounts throughout the day. Some managers see this as a detriment to productivity while others see it as a necessary concession which affords the employees opportunities to spend more time on their job – which the Pew study also indicates is happening.

Overall the Pew findings indicate that the networked environment in which today’s workers are immersed is a mixed blessing. While productivity increases and workers become more efficient in the use of their time for both work and personal purposes, there is the detrimental effect of “cognitive overload” that happens in a world that exchanges information “faster and faster” as Shirky’s (2008) Chapter 7 is titled. Last week’s reading by Gartner (2010) reinforces this idea by stating “work will increasingly happen 24-hours a day, seven days a week. In this work environment, the lines between personal, professional, social and family matters, along with organization subjects, will disappear.” As each week of this class goes by it becomes apparent that Shirky’s title “Here Comes Everybody” is absolutely appropriate. Leaders must learn to deal with this blizzard of information for the sake of themselves and, even more importantly, for the sake of those whom they lead.

This leads us to one of the most important Future Work Skills 2020 identified by the Institute for the Future (2011). Davies, Fidler, and Gorbis note that one of the 10 skills that members of the future workforce must develop is that of “Cognitive Load Management”. They define this skill as the ability to filter and synthesize the massive influx of data that workers receive in an efficient way that allows them to focus on what is important. Workers that do not develop this skill will be overwhelmed by the cognitive overload to the point of making little contribution to their organization.

It seems this particular blizzard shows no signs of letting up.


Best Buy. (2014, July 25). Retrieved from

Davies, A., Fidler, D., & Gorbis, M. (2011). Future work skills 2020. Future Work Skills, 1-14. Retrieved from

Gartner, Inc. (2010, August 4). Gartner says the world of work will witness 10 changes during the next 10 years [Press release]. Retrieved from

Madden, M., & Jones, S. (2008, September 24). Networked workers. Retrieved from

Pepitone, J. (2013, March 05). Best Buy ends work-from-home program. Retrieved from

Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin Press.

Yahoo! Inc. (2014, July 24). Retrieved from

This Is My Life. How Did They Know?

This seems to be an appropriate time to confess that over the past two years I have not read every page of my reading assignments for this doctoral program. However, I do find that for this particular class on Technology and Leadership the videos and reading assignments are so timely and insightful that I read and watch many parts of them a second and third time. I have come to know enough about Ignatian spirituality that I realized it would be instructive for me to enter into a period of reflection to attempt to discern why I find the material so captivating.

The fruit of that reflection can only be expressed by saying that what I read this week from Gartner (2010), Husband (2013), and Shirky (2008) described with stunning accuracy the world of work in which I find myself immersed. Regarding those few hours a week in which I am not engaged in work, the reading also accurately describes my “free time” spent individually or with family and friends. For the past several decades I have ascribed to the principles of time management laid out in the work of Stephen Covey with a special emphasis on those ideas expressed in First Things First (1994). This is tantamount to saying that I spend a reasonable amount of time thinking about how I will spend my time. You can watch more about Covey’s work here. 

Since it was all found to be so relevant to me it seems appropriate to highlight the conditions described by the authors that are most profoundly true in my own situation. These are as follows:

Husband (2013) describes today’s environment as the “permanent white water” in which today’s decision makers operate. This is such an appropriate metaphor for the situations that leaders find themselves in today. An expert rafting guide leading others through whitewater requires sensitivity to changing conditions such as water level, obstacles in the river causing dangerous waves that must be negotiated, and the surrounding weather. Such a guide must also understand the strengths and weaknesses of those with whom they are working with in the raft. Finally, they must have an indefatigable energy to stay engaged with the river until they reach a calm spot in the stream. Of course, in today’s world those calm spots seem to occur less often than they once did.

The decreasing frequency of these calm spots led to me nodding my head in enthusiastic agreement as I read the point that Gartner (2010) makes about the growing “de-routinization of work”. The fact that robots are replacing work by individuals that can be automated (work during the calm spots) should cause us all to pause and give thanks that there are still many positions requiring non-routine functions that only human beings with capacity to analyze, synthesize, and interact can adequately complete. Those who can do such work well will continue to find gainful employment that allows them to make a contribution to the world and the well-being of their families.

Reflecting on scandals within the Catholic Church, Shirky (2008) poignantly reminds those in positions of authority in larger institutions that are hierarchical in nature that they are well-advised to reflect on the lessons regarding the impact of electronic media that now allows traditional structures of hierarchal authority to be circumvented – particularly in cases where large groups of people become aware of injustice. The Catholic school in which I work is such an organization – 1,200 students, 230 teachers and staff, 2,500 parents, 10,000 alumni etc. Even more noteworthy, the students with whom we work are much more fluent in the languages of this evolving form of linked communication than the adults who supervise them. Control of the message is tenuous at best.

I believe that Shirky’s work could be improved by giving other examples of this phenomenon at work in today’s world as opposed to focusing on events that unfolded in 2002. The rise of the “unapproved message” made possible by the expansive access to electronic media has impact on all traditional structures of authority in journalism, politics, corporations, and education. Nonetheless, Shirky is to be commended for the insightful comparison of similar events in Boston in 1992 that could largely be ignored. In 2002, thanks to the growing interconnectivity of the world, that was no longer the case. Today’s leaders are wise to take note that we now operate in a refreshingly stimulating environment.

Finally, I must return to a point raised by Gartner. The press release notes that “work will increasingly happen 24-hours a day, seven days a week. In this work environment, the lines between personal, professional, social and family matters, along with organization subjects, will disappear.” For better or worse, this is the life that I live. How did they know so much about me?


Andrade, R. (2013, December 27). 7 big rocks | Stephen Covey | YOLO video on choosing success. Retrieved from

Covey, S. R., Merrill, A. R., & Merrill, R. R. (1994). First things first: To live, to love, to learn, to leave a legacy. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Gartner, Inc. (2010, August 4). Gartner says the world of work will witness 10 changes during the next 10 years [Press release]. Retrieved from

Husband, J. (2013). What is wirearchy? [Web log post]. Retrieved July 15, 2014, from

Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin Press.

What Would Aragorn Do?

‘It is hard to be sure of anything among so many marvels. The world is all grown strange. Elf and Dwarf in company walk in our daily fields; and folk speak with the Lady of the Wood and yet live; and the Sword comes back to war that was broken in the long ages ere the fathers of our fathers rode into the Mark! How shall a man judge what to do in such times?’

‘As he ever has judged,’ said Aragorn. ‘Good and ill have not changed since yesteryear; nor are they one thing among Elves and Dwarves and another among Men. It is a man’s part to discern them, as much in the Golden Wood as in his own house.’

In this conversation between two future kings, Eomer and Aragorn, in The Two Towers (1954) author J. R. R. Tolkein gives a prescient view of the universal challenges that change brings to leaders. Just as fast-paced change was a part of Tolkien’s world, so it is with ours. Though we can argue over the seemingly increasing speed of that change when past generations are compared to our own, the fundamental principle is the same. Human beings, especially leaders, are forced to make decisions regarding situations that are new to them and taking place in an environment that is previously unknown and uncharted.

As a leader of a school community over the past 25 years, I can tell you that the question voiced by Eomer, “How shall a man judge what to do in such times?” is never very far from my thoughts. I suspect that many of today’s leaders feel the same. The exceptionally well-done blog posts by Dixon (2009) give us affirmation that leaders over the past two decades have certainly been dealing with a similar question as they grapple with the best ways to deal with the growing availability of information.

Several of Dixon’s statements resonate profoundly with my own experience:

1)   In the 1990s knowledge management professionals discovered that technology alone was not enough to manage knowledge.

2)   Knowledge is not stable over time but is constantly changing. (I am reminded of Bennis’ lament over the difficulty of herding cats – it seems that managing information may be just as difficult.)

3)   There is growing recognition of the value of the critical knowledge that those on the front line of an organization’ as the role of reflection came to be appreciated methods to facilitate a successful process of reflection need to be refined and considered.

4)   The processes for leveraging collective knowledge must embrace a commitment to cognitive diversity. This is reminiscent of the “opposable mind” concept so well developed by Martin (2009). Leaders who have not experienced the value of frank dialogue among those with different perspectives are surely operating at a handicap in today’s world.

The role of the leader then is to convene a conversation that brings people with diverse perspectives together to tackle and discuss a properly framed question. The leader is responsible for both framing the question and for convening the conversation. It is out of these conversations that many of the most perplexing questions facing organizations begin to find appropriate responses that lead the organization on a path to proactively addressing its challenges.

Shirky (2008) points to the complicated nature of those conversations in today’s world with so many forms of social media. The neatness of traditional media has been replaced by the messiness of social media. However, the growth of Communities of Practice has allowed for a focus to be brought to social media communications that benefits organizations who learn to use this tool properly. Through these communities of practice a global conversation can take place in beneficial ways that were heretofore unthinkable.

As Aragorn stated, “Good and ill have not changed since yesteryear… It is a man’s part to discern them.” In today’s language, Tolkien would have likely agreed to a translation that reads “it is a leader’s part to discern them”. The current thinking in best practices of leadership is that the discernment sometimes takes place in an expanded conversation with those who care for the organization and have a vested interest in its future.


Dixon, N. (2009, May 2). Where knowledge management has been and where it is going – part one [Web log post]. Retrieved from

Dixon, N. (2009, May 10). Knowledge management: Where we’ve been and where we’re going – part two [Web log post]. Retrieved from—part-two.html

Dixon, N. (2009, July 30). Where knowledge management has been and where it is going – part three [Web log post]. Retrieved from

Martin, R. L. (2009). The opposable mind: Winning through integrative thinking. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin Press.

Tolkien, J. R. (1954). The two towers; being the second part of The Lord of the rings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

The Eagles Are Tweeting


What is it?

My view of Twitter holds that it is an enhanced text messaging service that differs from texting in the following ways:

1)   The message is limited to 140 characters.

2)   Links to pictures can also be sent and do not count toward the 140 character limit.

3)   The only people who can receive the message are those who “follow” you.

4)   It is not possible to send messages to specific individuals. Each message goes out to all of your followers.

5)   Each individual message is called a tweet. A message can be segmented by placing a “hashtag” indicated by the # symbol at the end of a tweet. Tweets with the same hashtag end up being accessible to anyone with a twitter account who intentionally searches for all tweets that have that same hashtag. For instance, if I tweet a message that reads, “I love my courses at Creighton. #GoBluejays!” Anyone who has a twitter account can search all messages that were given a “#GoBluejays!” hashtag.

How might it be used for your leadership situation (education, healthcare, business, non-profit, etc.)?

General Comments

Twitter may be more famous because of the number of times people have been forced to retract lamentable tweets. These moments usually come when famous people with Twitter accounts say something that one would not normally say in polite company or if the whole world is listening. Those of us who live in Indianapolis are familiar with the owner of the Indianapolis Colts sending out regrettable tweets from a bar that he is at 3 AM on a Monday morning. These can be entertaining but can also damage one’s reputation. Whether one has a Twitter account or not, these controversial tweets then get reported in the broader media for worldwide viewing over the Internet.

In spite of these ignominious moments, Twitter is a remarkably efficient way to communicate short messages to followers that can sometimes number in the millions. Pope Francis, whom I have never met, can get a message to me (if I follow him) and his other 4.1 million followers in remarkably efficient fashion. That message can then be “retweeted” by every one of his 4.1 M followers to each of their followers’ Twitter accounts. This cascading effect of the Twitter network allows for messages to spread faster than wildfire as noted in our previous week’s work on the earthquake in China.

Education Applications

High school teachers that I work with have noted that the use of Facebook is rapidly declining among the 14-18 group. Most of our students like the quicker and more concise format of Twitter. A teacher can use this to their advantage by requesting that the students follow them if they want to keep up on the latest happenings related to the class. Teachers can also use their Twitter account to send out useful supplemental materials – especially web links – that may add additional clarity to subject matter covered in an earlier class. Twitter is flexible enough so that individual accounts can be set up for individual groupings of students so that each class can be communicated with separately. Administratively, some schools are using Twitter to send out homework reminders, snow day announcements, weather cancellations of athletic contests, and general “feel-good” news and pictures to craft a positive public image of their schools.

Another educational use of Twitter is to use the hashtag function as a means of researching topics. For instance, if I am an English teacher at a Catholic high school and want my students to write an essay about Pro-life organizations, one method that I can suggest they consider for research is to do a hashtag search on their Twitter accounts for postings under the #prolife postings. A remarkably diverse set of articles, organizations, and individual leaders will immediately present themselves for immediate use by the students.

Leadership Applications

For a great introduction into the ways that world leaders are using Twitter see Beth Kanter’s blog here. All but one of the G20 governments have an official Twitter presence. Kanter (2014) reports that six of the seven G7 leaders have individual twitter accounts. Pope Francis (@Pontifex) is the most influential world leader on Twitter. His Spanish tweets are retweeted on average more than 10,000 times each compared to Barak Obama’s average of 1,400 retweets. Modern politics has become acutely aware of the “sound bite” nature of today’s political discourse. Twitter is tailor-made for such sloganizing. This is not only true of countries and states but also true of any communication to smaller organizations and groups. Leaders who are committed to communicating a vision can use Twitter to reinforce the elements of this vision for all members of the community and thus build understanding of their hopes and dreams for their organizations.

(3) What are downsides to using it? 

The downside to using Twitter is that it is, by nature of the application, a one-way conversation. While it is a good way to get a message out and to begin to get others thinking about issues, it is not to be confused with a conversation one would normally have with a small group of people. The messages are by nature short. This makes it difficult to discuss complex issues in any sort of detail.


Kanter, B. (2014, June 25). How Do World Leaders Use Twitter? New Findings from Annual Twiplomacy Study. Retrieved from